← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/24575/2021dismissed

P.Ramu v. The State Rep By

2021-12-16Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Sixteenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.24575 of 2021 P.RAMU [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S4 POLICE STATION, NANDAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 089 (CRIME NO.186/2021) For Petitioner : M/S.K.NATARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) of IPC in Cr.No.186 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant lodged a complaint before the respondent police stated that petitioner abused the defacto complainant and her children with filthy languages and assaulted her with lamp and sustained injury. Hence, the law enforcing agency registered a case against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner attacked the defacto complaint thereby she sustained injury and investigation is pending in this case and hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner assaulted the defacto complaint, she sustained injury, which needs detailed investigation.

6. In view of the above facts, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition seeking anticipatory bail is dismissed.

-sd/- 16/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S4 POLICE STATION, NANDAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 089 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1CC to M/S.K.NATARAJAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.14897 CRL OP.24575/2021 Date :16/12/2021 CSK 03/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/