Shantha v. R. Ruckmani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 04.03.2024 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI & C.M.P.No.6568 of 2017

1. Shantha.

2. Dhamodaran.

3. Rajan.

4. Ravi Kumar.

... Appellants /versus/

1. R.Ruckmani.

2. Kaliammal.

3. The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation, Coimbatore.

... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 05.10.2016 made in A.S.No.32 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Coimbatore, confirming the judgment and decree dated 20.01.2014 made in O.S.No.120 of 2014 on the file of the III Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

For Appellant : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.Dinesh Kumar Page No.1/4

J U D G M E N T

The Learned Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. On 01.03.2024, this Court has directed to post the matter under the caption for 'dismissal', since the Learned Counsel for the appellants had already informed the Court even as early as on 31.01.2024 that he has given change of vakalat and on all the previous hearing, the names of the appellants are also printed in the cause list.

3. Today, when the matter is take up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants in person. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

04.03.2024 Index :Yes/No.

Internet :Yes/No.

bsm Page No.2/4

Copy to:-

1. The Principal Sub Court, Coimbatore,

2. The III Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore. Page No.3/4

P.B.BALAJI,J.

bsm & C.M.P.No.6568 of 2017 04.03.2024 Page No.4/4