Arokiyaraj v. The State Rep. By

CRL.O.P.NO.5933 of 2016 K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J.

The petitioner, who is arrayed as A7, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 IPC in Crime No.7 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused is alleged to have committed theft of Generator fixed in the Aircell Tower. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Further, it is submitted that the co-accused was granted anticipatory bail by this Court. 4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that the case property was recovered.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the case property was recovered and also co-accused was released on anticipatory bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sirkali and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m, for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J ari 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 22.03.2016 Crl.O.P.No.5933 of 2016