V.Nagarajan v. The Regional Transport

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.12.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.Nos.42462 & 42463 of 2002 & WMP.Nos.62650 to 62652 of 2002 V.Nagarajan

...Petitioner in W.P.No.42462/02

B.Selvanayagi

...Petitioner in W.P.No.42463/02

-Vs1. The Regional Transport Authority, Salem.

2.The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Chennai.

...Respondents in both WPs

Writ Petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent made in R.P.No.16 of 1997, dated 11.12.2001 in confirming the order of the first respondent made in R.No.B2/26772/93, dated 05.12.1997 and quash the same.

For Petitioner in both W.Ps.

: Mr.M.Palani For R-1 in both W.Ps.

: Mr.M.Elumalai, GA COMMON ORDER Mr.M.Palani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the prayer sought for in these writ petitions have become infructuous and therefore, he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundles today.

2. Considering the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the endorsement he has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

made, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar smi To,

1. The Regional Transport Authority, Salem. 2.The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. +2cc to Mr.M.Palani, Advocate, S.R.No.92003,92004 W.P.Nos.42462 & 42463 of 2002 KK(CO) RRK(24/01/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/