P.Nagarajan v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL.O.P.No.24712 of 2021 P.Nagarajan ... Petitioner
Versus
The State The Inspector of Police, Kammapuram Police Station, Cuddalore District.
(Crime No.297 of 2021) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in respect of Crime No.297 of 2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Kammapuram Police Station, Cuddalore District pending investigation.
For Petitioner :
Mr.K.Balaji For Respondent :
Mr.N.S.Suganthan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *********
O R D E R
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 4(1)(a) and 4(1-A) of TN Prohibition Act, in Crime No.297 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant had lodged a complaint before the respondent police, while he was on rounds at Kammapuram East Colony, some people gathered back of their yard, by seeing the police the petitioner and other person are said to have filed away from the place of occurrence, the defacto complainant searching the place, where he found Five Litre of illicit Spirit in a white cover. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that in 4 previous cases he acquitted and in all other cases he is in bail. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that 23 previous cases pending against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate - II, Virudhachalam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of the Registered Advocate Clerk Association, Virudhachalam within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.
[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
-sd/- 17/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, VIRUDHACHALAM.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUDDALORE DISTRICT. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMMAPURAM POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE REGISTERED ADVOCATE CLERK ASSOCIATION, VIRUDHACHALAM.
+1 CC to M/S.K.BALAJI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.15000 CRL OP.24712/2021 Date :17/12/2021 RW 22/12/2021