Maniselvan Raja v. State By The Lnspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Maniselvan Raja Petitioner(s) Vs State by The Inspector of Police Selaiyur Police Station Pallikarani District Chennai.

(Crime No.153 of 2025) Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS Act 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 153 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Selaiyur Police Station, Pallikaranai District .

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.V.Gopinath Velayuthem For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Udhayakumar, GA (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS Act in Crime No.153 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner took three cars on a rental basis on January 16, 2025. However, the petitioner neither paid the rent nor returned the cars, despite repeated requests. The petitioner allegedly informed the defacto complainant that he had pledged the cars to meet his expenses. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he is ready to abide by any stringent condition. Hence, prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution's case and on instruction submitted that the cars were returned by the petitioner during the enquiry.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner in this case is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Tambaram on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further conditions that:

[a] If the petitioner fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this order shall stand

automatically cancelled;

[b] The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one week; [d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police officer as and when required; [f] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [g] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[h] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the

aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[i] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

19-09-2025 Gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The Inspector of Police Selaiyur Police Station Pallikarani District Chennai.

2. The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Tambaram.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR J.

gbi CRL OP No. 21021 of 19-09-2025