← Library
Madras High CourtA/4855/2023allowed as prayed for

M/S.Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar Constructions v. The Superintending Engineer

2023-09-19Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose3 pages

Application Nos.4855 and 4858 of 2023 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

M/s.Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar Constructions, Rep. By its Managing Director Madurai.

... Applicant in both applications

Versus

The Superintending Engineer, WRO., PWD, Periyar Vaigai Basin Circle, Madurai - 625 001.

... Respondent in both applications Mr.R.Siddharth, learned Government Advocate, for the respondent, has appeared through the Video Conferencing.

2. These applications have been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking for extension of time to the arbitral tribunal to pronounce the arbitral award.

3. This Court is satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavit filed in support of these applications, as sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for seeking extension of time to the arbitral tribunal to pronounce the arbitral award.

1/3

4. Accordingly, these applications are allowed as prayed for by directing the arbitral tribunal to pronounce the arbitral award within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 19.09.2023 rkm 2/3

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

rkm Application No.4855 and4858 of 2023 19.09.2023 3/3