Madras High CourtCRL OP/6221/2016disposed of

R.Narayanasamy v. State Rep. By

2016-03-21Honourable Ms. Justice R.Mala2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.03.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.No.6221 of 2016 R.Narayanasamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1. State represented by The Director General of Police (L & O) Police Head Quarters, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

2. State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai - 606 601.

3. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station Arni, Thiruvannamalai District 632 301.

4. Thiru.Sundararaj ... Respondents Prayer :

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the 1st respondent and the 2nd respondent to thoroughly investigate on the complaints registered in 91/2016 dated 28.02.2016 of the petitioner against the above said persons.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Baskaran For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to thoroughly investigate on the complaint in C.S.R.No.91/2016 dated 28.02.2016 of the petitioner against the above said persons.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given a complaint on 28.02.2016 and it was assigned C.S.R.No.91/2016, but the respondents have not enquired into the matter and registered a case. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the complaint given by the petitioner was assigned C.S.R.No.91/2016 by the Arni Town Police Station and petition enquiry is pending. He would further submit that the petitioner is not co-operating for the enquiry and prayed for the dismissal of the petition.

5.Considering the submissions made on either side and on perusal of the typed set of papers it is known that the complaint given by the petitioner was assigned C.S.R.No.91/2016 by the Arni Town Police Station. Hence, this Court directs the third respondent to enquire C.S.R.No.91/2016 as expeditiously as possible and follow the dictum laid down in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)] and register a case, if any cognizable offence is made out. The petitioner is directed to co-operate for the enquiry with the respondent police. The petitioner is also directed to appear before the third respondent on 30.03.2016 along with all relevant documents.

6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. pri s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The The Director General of Police (L & O) Police Head Quarters, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai - 606 601.

3. The Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station Arni, Thiruvannamalai District 632 301.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. + 1 cc to Mr.N.Baskaran, Advocate Sr 4453 (22/4/16) ctk(co) prk5/4 Crl.O.P.No.6221 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/