Subramani v. State Rep. By

Crl.O.P.No.20955 of 2023 Crl.O.P.No.20955 of 2023 RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN.,J.

The petitioner who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(2) of I.P.C, in Crime No.224 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the de-facto complainant have got 1 1/2 acres of land each and one Gunasekaran have common well in 3 cents of land and the well is closed two years back and there is a dispute regarding 3 cents of land between them. On 14.06.2023, when the de-facto complainant went to the disputed land and put up ridge in ti, the petitioner went there and scolded in filthy language and assaulted in right and left hand wrist and threatened . Hence the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the due to previous land dispute the petitioner assaulted and caused injury to the de-facto complainant. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

Crl.O.P.No.20955 of 2023 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J., nvi 5.Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) and perused the materials available on record.

6.Taking into consideration, the nature and gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 14.09.2023 nvi Crl.O.P.No.20955 of 2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2