Zameer Ul Hag @ Zameer Ul Hag Naseem v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Seventeenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.24835 of 2021 ZAMEER UL HAG @ ZAMEER UL HAG NASEEM [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTUR POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE CITY, COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.1038/2021 For Petitioner : M/S.A.TAMILARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Government Advocate, (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.11.2021 for the offence under 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Section 506(ii) of the Indian penal Code, 1860 and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, in Crime No.1038 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is running computer selling shop under the name and style of compu soft. On 30.11.2021, at about 17.15 hours, the respondent police went to the occurrence place and found that the petitioner was standing in front of the shop and taken obscene images of woman in public. On seeing the police party, he tried to escape. But the police officials rounded up him. During the course of investigation, it came to know that the petitioner threatened the general public by showing unlicensed pistol. Further, the petitioner is also doing 2nd hand car business and he used to threaten the person who came for the purchase of the cars. Further, during the time of IPL season, the petitioner was doing match fixing and he telecast the obscene videos of woman. Hence, the complaint https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he is falsely implicated in this case. He would pray for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) raised objection stating that the petitioner threatened the general public by showing un-licensed pistol. Further, the petitioner is also doing 2nd hand car business and he used to threaten the person who came for the purchase of the cars. Further, during the time of IPL season, the petitioner was doing match fixing and he telecast the obscene videos of woman. After arrest, two pistols, bullets, cell phones, pen-drive were recovered and the investigation is yet to be completed.

5. On Seeing the grave nature of the offence and conduct of the petitioner if he released on bail he may abscond and tamper the evidence, therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 17/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, COIMBATORE.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTUR POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE CITY, COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.A.TAMILARASAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.24835/2021 Date :17/12/2021 RW 29/12/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/