Harikrishnan v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

1. Harikrishnan S/o.Ramachandiran, No.23, Vedhappar Street, Natham, Chengalpattu District.

Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station, Chengalpattu District. Cr.No.290/2025.

Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police concerned in Cr.No.290/2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s):

R.Parthiban M.Shimiyon Edwin For Respondent(s):

Mr. S. Udayakumar

Government Advocate crl. side

ORDER

This petition has been filed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police concerned in Cr.No.290/2025 on the file of the respondent.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons chased the defacto complainant in a car waylaid him and beaten him extorted mobile phone and sum of Rs.200/- fled away. Hence, FIR registered under Section 304(2) BNS.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the respondent police. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate crl. Side submits that the petitioner waylaid the defacto complainant extorted mobile phone and a sum of Rs.200/-. Hence, he prays to dismiss this petition.

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Chengalpattu, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent police on alternative days at 10.00 a.m for a period of 12 weeks.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. 09-09-2025 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No. II, Chengalpattu

2. The Inspector of Police, Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station, Chengalpattu District.

T.V.THAMILSELVI J.

CRL OP No. 20863 of 09-09-2025