M/S.Mahaveer Finance India Limited v. Mr.N.Jaganathan And 2 Others
Application No.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
This application has been filed by the applicant/finance company under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint their employee viz. Mr.S.Muthupattaraja, Manager (Legal), Chennai, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle more particularly described in the schedule to the Judges Summons wherever stationed in the premises of the respondents or wherever it is found and with whomsoever it is found with powers to breakdown the premises and grant permission to the receiver to obtain police aid from the concerned police officer.
2. The first respondent availed of a vehicle loan from the Applicant-company and executed a loan agreement No.23699 dated 29.09.2018, in which respondents 2 and 3 are stood as guarantors, for a sum of Rs.5,50,000/-, to be paid in 34 installments and the first installment commenced from 05.11.2018 and the re-payments were to run till 05.08.2021. It is stated that as of 31.08.2019, a sum of Rs.7,15,230/- is outstanding. In terms of the loan agreement executed by the respondents, the applicant/Finance company is entitled to repossess the vehicle in the event of default committed by the 1/4
respondents. It is also submitted that the continued use of the vehicle by the respondents would depreciate its value.
3. Notice sent to the respondents has been served and affidavit of service is also filed to that effect. Though the name of the respondents are printed in the cause list, there is no representation for them either in person or through counsel.
4. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is satisfied that the applicant has made out a prima facie case in its favour and accordingly, Mr.S.Muthupattaraja, Manager (Legal), Chennai of the applicant company is appointed as Receiver to take custody of the vehicle. The receiver will be entitled to take possession of the vehicle from the respondents or their agent or any one in possession thereof. If necessary, the Receiver shall get police assistance and the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station, within whose jurisdiction the vehicle is found, will render requisite assistance for this purpose.
5. The agreement entered into between the applicant and the respondents provides for arbitration in the event of disputes and 2/4
differences between the parties. The applicant shall commence arbitration proceedings and the Receiver shall preserve the vehicle without alienating or encumbrance thereof till the arbitration proceedings are concluded or till orders are passed by this Court in this application. However, in case the respondents make payment of the outstanding installments, the Receiver shall release the vehicle to the respondents. The receiver shall seize the vehicle within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. In view of the judgment passed in Firm Ashok Traders and another etc., v. Gurumukh Das Saluja and others etc., reported in 2004 (2) CTC 208, it is made clear that if the applicant herein fails to initiate arbitration proceedings within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the order made in this Application would stand revoked, without further orders.
7. Accordingly, this Application is closed.
24.10.2019 vsm The counsel for the applicant is permitted to receive the certified copy of the order of the Receiver and communicate the same to the Receiver.
3/4
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
vsm Application No.
24.10.
4/4