← Library
Madras High CourtA/3508/2025allowed

Dr Anita R Ratnam v. Meta Platforms Inc Represented By Its Authorized And 8 Others

2025-07-23Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-07-2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A.No.3508 of 2025 in C.S.(Comm.Div)No.119 of 2025 Dr. Anita R. Ratnam, 10, Cenotaph 2nd Lane, Teynampet, Chennai 600018.

..Applicant/Plaintiff Vs

1. Meta Platforms Inc, Represented by its Authorized Signatory, 1 Meta Way, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.

2. Telegram FZ LLC Represented by its Authorized signatory P O Box 501919, Business Central Towers, Tower A Office 1003 1004, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

3. Indian Overseas Bank, Represented by its General Manager No. 21, North Mada Street, Mylapore Chennai 600 004. Also at Branch Office, Joseph School, Civil Lines, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh - 273 001.

4. Bank of India, Represented by its General Manager At & Post Raxauldistt, West Champaran, Bihar 845305.

5. Shubham Kumar (John Doe)

6. Rashmika Gavit (John Doe)

7. Pooja Sawant (John Doe)

8. Harpreet Kaur (John Doe)

9. Shivam Dubey (John Doe) ... Respondents/Defendants Prayer : Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the O.S. Rules Read With Order VI Rule 16 of CPC, 1908, to allow the present application by granting leave to the applicant/plaintiff to amend the plaint, more specifically amend the paragraphs set out in Schedule A.

For Applicant:

Mr.Krishna V.S. for Mr.M.S. Bharath For Respondents:

Ms.J.Akila for R1/D1 Mr.Thriyambak J.Kannan for R2/D2 Mr.Siddhartha Ramarajan for R3/D3

ORDER

At the time of institution of the suit, the 9th defendant was impleaded as John Doe since the plaintiff did not have any particulars of the said defendant. After the 3rd defendant provided the details of the erstwhile John Doe, the plaintiff has presented this application for consequential amendments to the plaint.

2. None of the defendants, who are represented in the suit, have any objections to the proposed amendments.

3. Upon examining the proposed amendments and being satisfied that these amendments are consequential to the disclosure of the particulars of the earlier unnamed 9th defendant, this application is liable to be and is hereby allowed as prayed for. Consequently, the plaintiff is directed to carry out the amendments in the plaint on or before 30.07.2025 and serve a copy of the amended plaint on learned counsel for the defendants within a week therefrom. 23-07-2025 KJ (1/2)

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

KJ A.No.3508 of 2025 in C.S.(Comm.Div)No.119 of 2025 23-07-2025 (1/2)