R.Venkatesan, v. The Sub-Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.11.2020 CORAM :

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.7346 of 2017 and W.M.P. No. 8866 of 2017 R. Venkatesan ...Petitioner .vs.

1. The Sub Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Tahsildar, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to implement the order of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.3061/2016/B3, dated 24.06.2016 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.09.2016. For Petitioner : Mr. Siddiswaran For Respondents : Ms. A. Madhumathi, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

Mr.Siddiswaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous, hence, the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(LA) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Sub Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Tahsildar, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

+1cc to Mr.R.Jayaprakash, Advocate SR.No.37198 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.37387 W.P.No.7346 of 2017 and W.M.P. No.8866 of 2017 ppa (co) rr ii (11/12/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/