S.P. Thiyagarajan v. The Commissioner

C.M.P.No.20919 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.75894 of 2022 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

Heard Mr.N.Manoharan, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr.K.Mahesh, learned counsel for respondents 1 & 2, Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 3 to 5 and Mr.V.Anandha Natarajan, learned counsel for respondent 6.

Learned counsel for the sixth respondent opposed the application on the ground that no sufficient cause is mentioned.

The contention of learned counsel for the sixth respondent can be considered, on merits, while dealing with the writ appeal.

For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 391 days in representing the appeal is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.) 11.09.2023 drm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis