R.Dharmalingam v. The State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.837 of 2017 R.Dharmalingam

...Petitioner

-Vs1.The State rep by Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Sulur, Coimbatore District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sulur Sub Division, Karumathampatty Sub Division, Coimbatore District.

... Respondents PRAYER:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent under the supervision of the second respondent to grant adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.B.Viswanathan For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed to direct the first respondent under the supervision of the second respondent to grant adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members.

2.

Now, almost three years have been lapsed and hence, due to the lapse of period, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted now. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition, on fresh cause of action, if so advised.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.

With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vkr/msm To 1.The State rep by Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Sulur, Coimbatore District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sulur Sub Division, Karumathampatty Sub Division, Coimbatore District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

W.P.No.837 of 2017 AK(CO) RRS(05/04/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/