M.Venkatesan v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL.O.P.NO.6348 of 2016 K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J.

The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 269, 294(B) and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.2022 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to pathway dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant and criminally intimidated him.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that there is no injury.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no injury, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned XXII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m, for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J ari 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 22.03.2016 Crl.O.P.No.6348 of 2016