Arun @ Arun Selvam v. State Rep.By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.781 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to a wordy quarrel, the petitioner along another accused assaulted the de-facto complainant with iron road and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that due to a wordy quarrel, the petitioner along another accused assaulted the de-facto complainant with iron road and caused injuries. He

would submit that the petitioner has two previous cases as against him. He would further submit that the injured person has been discharged from hospital. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsel for both sides. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case that the petitioner has two previous cases as against him, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 14.10.2022 gd/anu A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

gd/anu 14.10.2022