← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/20744/2023granted

R.Thangaraj v. State Rep.By

2023-09-12Honourable Mr Justice G. Chandrasekharan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :12.09.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN R.Thangaraj ..Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, V-1, Villivakkam Police Station, Chennai - 600 049.

Crime No.858 of 2020 ...Respondent PRAYER:

Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending trial in S.C.No.380 of 2021 on the file of the XV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai in connection with Crime No.858 of 2020.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.V.G.Kartheeban For Respondent : Mr.S.Rajakumar Additional Public Prosecutor 1/6

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.07.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 324, 326, 307, 506(2) of IPC read with Section 34 of IPC pending in S.C.No.380 of 2021 on the file of the learned XV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai in connection with Crime No.858 of 2020, seeks bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, petitioner is an accused in S.C.No.380 of 2021. Since, petitioner did not appear before the Court on 23.12.2021, Non Bailable Warrant was issued against him on the same day and the same was executed on 3107.2023, since then, petitioner is in Judicial Custody. He further submitted that, petitioner would be very regular hereafter and thus, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

3. In response, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the petition on the ground that, due to the absence of the petitioner, there is a delay in trial.

4. Considering the circumstances under which the Non2/6

Bailable Warrant was issued against the petitioner and subsequently remanded to Judicial Custody on 31.07.2023 and also having regard to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner would regularly appear before the Court hereafter, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned XV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall appear before the learned XV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai at 10.00.a.m., on all working days until further orders and on all hearing till the completion of trial; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during 3/6

investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. 12.09.2023 Sma To 4/6

1. XV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai 2.The Inspector of Police, V-1, Villivakkam Police Station, Chennai - 600 049.

3.Sub Jail Puzhal, 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras G.CHANDRASEKHARAN. J.

5/6

Sma Crl.O.P.No.20744 of 2023 12.09.2023 6/6