Appunu @ Renugopal v. State Rep By

Crl.O.P.No.6529 of 2016 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

The petitioner, who is arrayed as A-6, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Section 399 of IPC in Crime No.130 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused had made preparations to commit dacoity, resulting in the registration of the case.

3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and based on the confession of the co-accused, he has been implicated as accused in this case.

4.Learned Government Advocate [Criminal Side] appearing for the respondent would submit that A-1 to A-4 have already been arrested and remanded to judicial custody and the petitioner / A-6 is involved in one previous case.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

sri 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Vellore and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 31.03.2016 sri Crl.O.P.No.6529 of 2016