Jagadeesh Prathap v. M/S.Kutty Flush Doors And Furniture Company Pvt.Ltd.

A.No.4750 of 2022 A.No.4750 of 2022 in C.S.No.473 of 2019 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

In the relief sought in the Judges Summons filed to support the affidavit, it had been mentioned that the evidence of the plaintiff has to be reopened for further cross examination.

2. It is mutually agreed by both the learned counsels for the plaintiff and the defendant that the witness of the plaintiff had been cross examined in full and that the plaintiff would only require further witnesses to be examined.

3. It is stated that due to inadvertence an endorsement had been made before the learned Master that they have no further witnesses. This necessitated filing of the present application.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the defendant also.

5. The application stands allowed. But the relief which is granted to the plaintiff is to adduce further oral evidence. It is only appropriate that before adducing such oral evidence the plaintiff discloses the list of witnesses and nature of evidence to be adduced by such witness and serve a copy of the same to the learned counsel for the defendant. 27.10.2022 (1/2) ssi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

A.No.4750 of 2022 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

ssi A.No.4750 of 2022 27.10.2022 (1/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2