← Library
Madras High CourtWP/27808/2025dismissed

Nainamma, v. Government Of Tamil Nadu

2025-09-09Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr.Justice G.Arul Murugan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.09.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & W.M.P.Nos.31147 & 31148 of 2025 Nainamma ..

Petitioner Vs.

1. Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government Housing & Urban Development Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Greater Chennai Corporation Rep. by its Commissioner Ripon Building, Chennai 600 003.

3. Greater Chennai Corporation Rep. by its Zonal Officer Zone IX, No.4, 4th Cross Street Lake View Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034.

4. Greater Chennai Corporation Rep. by its Assistant Executive Engineer Zone IX, No.1Lake Area 4th Cross Street Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034.

..

Respondents

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent vide their Letter No.Z.O.IX.C.No.03545/2025 dated 27.05.2025 relating to enforcement action of locking and sealing of the premises in Old Door No.121, New Door No.162, Bells Road, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005, quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to conduct a rehearing after due notice to the petitioner by affording opportunity of personal hearing.

For Petitioner :

Mr.D.S.Rajasekaran For Respondents :

Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate for Respondent-1 Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu Standing Counsel for Respondents 2 to 4

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Though number of grounds were urged by petitioner to assail the correctness and validity of the lock and seal order, learned counsel for petitioner fairly states that petitioner has already

approached the revisional authority by making a revision petition under Section 80A of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.

2. In that view of the matter, without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is dismissed with liberty to press the revision petition pending before the revisional authority, which shall be disposed as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim applications are also dismissed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.09.2025 Index :

Yes/No Yes/No kpl To

1. The Secretary to Government Housing & Urban Development Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation

Ripon Building, Chennai 600 003.

3. The Zonal Officer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone IX, No.4, 4th Cross Street Lake View Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034.

4. The Assistant Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone IX, No.1Lake Area 4th Cross Street Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034.

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.

(kpl) 09.09.2025