Jahufar Sathick v. Inspector Of Police
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) of I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.342 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.It is stated that the petitioner herein is A1 and the parents are A2 and A3. A2 and A3 had already been granted anticipatory bail. My learned predecessor had referred the petitioner to mediate with the de-facto complainant, but mediation has failed.
3. The case of the prosecution is that from the date of marriage, the petitioner and his parents abused and harassed the de-facto complainant physically and mentally. On the occurrence day, the petitioner abused her with filthy language, assaulted her using iron rod, caused injuries and threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, the case.
4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent police submits that the petitioner abused her with filthy language, assaulted her using iron rod, caused injuries and threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the FIR.
7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and the nature of the offence committed by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tambaram on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the
petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on everyday at 10.30a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required; [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
07.12.2023 nvi
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
nvi 07.12.2023