Arulmigu Bashya Kara Adi Chenna Kesava Perumal Temple v. The Union Of India And 26 Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA Arulmigu Bashya Kara Adi Chenna Kesava Perumal Temple, Rep. by its Executive Officer, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033 ... Applicant in all Applications Vs.

1. Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary To Govt., Ministry Of Finance, New Delhi 110 011.

2. The Director (Other Taxes), Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Ministry Of Finance, New Delhi 110 064.

3. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (II Circle) Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034.

4. The Sub Registration Office, Mambalam, Chennai 600 017.

5. The Tashildar, Mambalam, Guindy Taluk, Chennai 600 078.

6.D.Gnanasekaran 7.V.Sukumar 8.Shantha 9.B.Balaraman 10.P.Padmanaban 11.N.V.Chitty Babu 12.N.V.Govindarajan 13.N.V.Sathyanarayanan 14.Hamsa Bai 15.Lakshmi Bai 16.Rukmani Bai 17.B.Ravi Kumar 18.B.Anantha Kumar 19.B.Harikumar 20.B.Baskar 21.Serwell Housing A Partnership Firm, Rep. by its Partner S.Parthasarathy,\ Off.At.No.8/2, Chari St., T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.

22.Kalalakshmi 23.Lalitha 24.Sujatha 25.Suresh Kumar 26.Kokila 27.Sugunammal ... Respondents in all Applications PRAYER in A No. 3872 of 2025:- To condone the delay of 2965 of days in filing Application to set aside

the abatement caused by the death of the 6th Defendant D.Gunasekaran in the above C.S.No.292 of 2005.

PRAYER in A No. 3873 of 2025:- To set aside the abatement caused by the Death of the 6th Defendant D.Gunasekaran in the above C.S.No.292 of 2005. PRAYER in A No. 3874 of 2025:- To bring on record the following persons Respondents 22 to 27 herein namely 1.Kalalakshmi 2.Lalitha 3.Sujatha 4. Suresh Kumar 5.Kokila 6. Suganammal as the legal representatives of the deceased D.Gunasekaran, the 6th Defendant and rank them as Defendants 23 to 28 in the above C.S.No.292 of 2005.

For applicant : Mr. M.Vijayakumar (in all Applications) ----- C O M M O N O R D E R These applications have been filed to condone the delay in filing steps for the deceased 6th defendant, to set aside the abatement and also to bring legal representative on record.

2. Despite notice served on the legal representative of the deceased 6th defendant /proposed parties is going to be the newly impleaded party and the affidavit of service had also been filed, no representation for the legal representative of the deceased 6th defendant.

Dr.R.N.MANJULA, J.

Maya

3. Taking into consideration of removing the technical difficulties in the course of conduction of the suit, these applications are allowed. No costs.

4. Amended to be carried out within a period of two weeks.

5. Let the amended copy of the plaint be filed within a period of two weeks.

15.09.2025 2/3 Maya