← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/3505/2022disposed of

Meenakshmi Sougoumar v. Sabarinath Radhakrishnan

2022-11-04Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated :07.04.2025 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Dr.Meenakshi Sougoumar, No.38, Thiiyagarajar Street, Raja Nagar, Orleanpet, Pondicherry 605 013.

..Petitioner/Petitioner /versus/ Dr.Sabarinath Radhakrishnan Permanent Resident of 303, Parsn Colors RED Nanjundapuram Road, Coimbatore 641 036.

Temporarily residing at:

123 Warrington Road, Prescot L35 5AD UK ..Respondent/Respondent Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to pass speedy disposal of the H.M.O.P.No.320 of 2019 pending before the Hon'ble Family Court Judge, Puducherry pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner :Mr.A.R.Nixon --------- 1/4

ORDER

Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to pass speedy disposal of H.M.O.P.No.320 of 2019, pending on the file of the Family Court, Puducherry.

2.This Court, by an order dated 04.11.2022, directed the Judge, Family Court, Puducherry, to dispose of the case in H.M.O.P.No.320 of 2019 within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. However, the learned Sessions Judge, Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court (Exclusively to deal with offences under POCSO Act), Puducherry, who has taken over the full Additional charge as the Judge, Family Court, Puducherry, has sent Letter No.78/Jud/FC/Pdy/2025/ dated 14.03.2025 stating that, on 20.11.2024, the cross examination of PW1 was closed as sufficient time was given and the case was posted for petitioner's side further evidence. Now, the respondent/husband filed an application in I.A.No.8 of 2015, dated 19.12.204 to recall PW-1 for cross examination and the said application was posted for orders on 15.03.2025. Further, it is stated that there are 1,747 cases pending before the Family Court, Puducherry, and 2/4

due to the workload of the Sessions Court dealing with offences under the POCSO Act, as well as the Family Court, she has sought six months' time to dispose of the case.

3. Taking note of the request of the learned Judge, time is extended by four months from today. Hence, the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court (Exclusively to deal with offences under the POCSO Act), Puducherry, who has taken full additional charge of the Family Court, Puducherry, is directed to dispose of the case, within a further period of four months and report the same to the Registry.

07.04.2025 ari To 1.The Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court exclusively to deal with offences under the POCSO Act, Puducherry.

2.The Family Court, Puducherry.

3/4

P.T.ASHA,J.

ari 07.04.2025 4/4