← Library
Madras High CourtWP/37358/2016disposed of

M/S.Orange Media Solutions v. The Divisional Commercial

2016-10-25Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.10.2016 CORAM :

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P. No.37358 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.32016 of 2016 M/s.Orange Media Solutions, Flat No.4B, Third Block, Ceebros Shyamala Gardens, Door No.136, Arcot Road, Saligramam, Chennai-600 093.

.. Petitioner -vs1.The Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway, Divisional Commercial Manager's Office, Chennai-600 003.

2.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003.

.. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the application of the petitioner dated 08.09.2016 for grant of license for display of advertisements at the Velachery Railway Station within a time limit as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner :

Mr.K.S.Natarajan For Respondents :

Mr.P.T.Ramkumar for R1 Mr.K.Soundararajan for R2 * * * * *

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The writ petition is a reflection of the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities at every level. At the initial level, the hoarding was permitted to be installed without obtaining the requisite permission of the Corporation in terms of the license given. It was the intervention of the Court which resulted in the hoarding being taken down. Now, when the petitioner has filed an application on 08.09.2016 for No Objection Certificate, for one and a half month, there is no decision on it.

2. The aforesaid position is completely unacceptable. There is no reason why people are compelled to come to this Court and spend money on account of such inaction of the authorities. The learned counsel for the second respondent states that the application of the petitioner would be decided promptly now.

3. We, thus, direct the application dated 08.09.2016 to be decided within a period of fifteen days from today and impose costs on respondent No.2 for the inaction, quantified at Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) to be recovered from the Officer, who sat over the file. The order to be brought to the notice of the second respondent/Commissioner.

4. The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. Consequently, W.M.P.No.32016 of 216 is closed. -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway, Divisional Commercial Manager's Office, Chennai-600 003.

2.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003.

+1 cc to Mr.K.S.Nagarajan Advocate sr60955 +1 cc to Mr.P.T.Ramkumar Advocate sr 60850 +1 cc to Government pleader sr 61119 +1 cc to M/s.K.Soundarajan Advocate sr 61449 dt:06/01/2017 W.P.No.37358 of 2016 aa26/10/2016