The New India Assurance v. A.Machagandhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.02.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.M.P.No.7649 of 2017 and C.M.A.SR.No.5687 of 2017 The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., No.1, Bharthi Road, Arcot Woodlands Building, Cuddalore-1.
.. Petitioner Vs.
1.A.Machagandhi 2.A.Ramesh 3.K.Chinnasamy 4.M.S.R.Finance Corporation No.108-A, North Car Street, Thiruvhengodi-637 201.
Namakkal Dist.
5.Mahaveeramul Chordia 6.S.N.Balasubramanian 7.Kairasi Finance Ltd.
Man Road, Nellikuppam.
.. Respondents PRAYER: C.M.P.No.7649 of 2017 is filed to condone the delay of 2000 days in filing the above appeal C.M.A.SR.No.5687 of 2017.
C.M.A.SR.No.5687 of 2017 is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgement and Decree dated 29.04.2011 made in M.C.O.P.No.904 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Add. Dist. Judge/FTC-2), Cuddalore District.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Chandran For Respondents : Mr.A.N.Visuanatha Rao, for R1 Mr.N.R.Rajagopalan, for R3 Mr.S.Alexraj, for R6
O R D E R
The present Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 2000 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Addl. Dist, Judge/FTC-2, Cuddalore, in MCOP. No.904 of 2003 dated 29.04.2011.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the award was passed on 29.04.2011, against which, Civil Review Petition was filed and the same was dismissed on 16.12.2016. The petitioner applied for copy of the award on 01.12.2016 and the same was made ready on 08.12.2016 and further the copy of the award was sent to the Regional Office to get
an opinion to prefer the appeal. Hence, delay of 2000 days has occurred in filing the appeal.
3.From the averments made in the affidavit, it is seen that the award was passed on 29.04.2011. The petitioner filed Civil Review Petition in I.A.No.610 of 2016 and the same got dismissed on 16.12.2016. Further, the petitioner has not explained the delay of five years in filing the Civil Review Petition and has not given any valid and sufficient reason to condone the delay of 2000 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. Further, the petitioner is not digilent enough to prosecute the case.
4.In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is rejected at the SR stage itself. No costs.
08.02.2019 gbi/Jer To The Addl. Dist. Judge/FTC-2, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Cuddalore.
V.M.VELUMANI,J.
gbi/Jer C.M.P.No.7649 of 2017 and C.M.A.SR.No.5687 of 2017 08.02.2019