← Library
Madras High CourtArb Appln/530/2024ordered

M/S Hdb Financial Services Limited v. Al Tousiff Minerals

2024-09-04Honourable Mr Justice K.Kumaresh Babu5 pages

K.KUMARESH BABU,J.

This application has been filed for an order of appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the vehicle TATA HITACHI ZX 370 LCH Construction Equipment Machine No. THEDD1L0T00001875 with all accessories fitted to the Vehicle lying at respondent premises morefully described hereunder, with police aid or break open the premises of from wherever found and handover the same to the applicant.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant provided a loan to the respondent for the purchase of the aforesaid vehicle and also a Loan Agreement had also been entered by the respondent with the applicant on 12.10.2023. The brief details in nutshell are as follows: S.No.

Particulars Remarks Name of the Lender M/s.HDB Financial Services Limited Name of the Borrowers M/s.AI Tousiff Minerals and Mr.Sahik Tousiff Hussain Name of the Guarantor Mr.Shaik Asiff Hussain Date of the Loan Agreement 12.10.2023 Loan amount Rs.68,19,123/- No. of installments 47 Installments First installment Rs.1,93,758/- Last installment Rs.1,93,758/- Page No.1/5

S.No.

Particulars Remarks Notice 13.05.2024 Reply to the Notice Nil Rate of interest 14.01% Amount claimed Rs.4,42,312/- Arbitration proceedings initiated Arbitration not yet invoked

3. The learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the respondent, having availed the loan, failed to repay the same. He would submit that the hypothecated vehicle is a movable asset and if it is kept in idle condition, it would get damaged and its value also gets deteriorated and hence he would urge this Court to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to seize and handover the vehicle to the applicant bank morefully described in the schedule to the Judges summons available at the respondent premises, in order to make the security effective and the money in dispute in arbitration is fully secured by way of sale of the vehicle in public auction after following due process of law.

4. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is satisfied that the applicant has made out a case in its favour and accordingly, Mr.D.Gentley Rathnaraj, Advocate, (Mobile No.9884041435/9840441435), having office at Old No.152, New No.315, 1st Floor, Thambu Chetty Street, Page No.2/5

Chennai-600001, is appointed as the Advocate Commissioner to seize the vehicle TATA HITACHI ZX 370 LCH Construction Equipment Machine No. THEDD1L0T00001875 to the custody of the Applicant, available at the respondent premises or wherever found and with whomsoever it is found and hand over the same to the custody of the applicant. He shall be paid his initial remuneration of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) in advance. The expenses towards his travel and stay shall be defrayed by the applicant. The said initial remuneration shall be paid to the Advocate Commissioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of communication from him. 5.

It is hereby made clear that if police help is required, the Advocate Commissioner shall make a request to the local police station within whose jurisdiction the vehicle is found and on such request being made, the Station House Officer shall send the Police Personnel along with the Advocate Commissioner to seize the vehicle. If break open of a lock is required the Advocate Commissioner shall do so in the presence of the police personnel who will counter sign the record evidencing the break open of the lock and to re-lock the premises. If the Advocate Commissioner find any difficulty with the jurisdictional police, he is at liberty to approach Superintendent of Police, who shall provide all necessary assistance to the Advocate Commissioner at the time Page No.

of seizure of the vehicle. After the seizure, the vehicle is to be handed over to the applicant or to their representative, after taking inventories.

6. Considering the fact that the respondent had taken a loan for the purchase of vehicle to provide themselves and their family a livelihood. The applicant shall grant the respondent a minimum period of four (4) weeks time to regularise the loan by payment of the defaulted amounts within the said period and if the respondent regularised their loan within the period expected by them, then the applicant shall return the vehicle to the respondent. This direction is issued considering the equity for the reason that the respondent had taken the loan only to eke out their livelihood.

7. List the case on 13.11.2024 for filing of the report of the Advocate Commissioner.

04.09.2024 Maya Page No.4/5

K.KUMARESH BABU,J.

Maya Dated : 04.09.2024 Page No.5/5