R.Elavarasan v. M.P.Sivan Arul

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.07.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI R.Elavarasan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.M.P.Sivan Arul 2.Sudhamalya 3.A.Mohammed Jaffer Sadiq 4.Angaiyarkanni ... Respondents Prayer:

Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, seeking to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed in Cr.M.P.1671 of 2023 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge for SC/ST(POA) Act Thiruppur District dated 10.08.2023 and set aside the same and consequently direct the learned Principal and Sessions Judge to adjudicate a private complaint afresh with accordance with law and issuance of process has to be served based on Full Bench dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in AIR 1963 SC 1430=1963 (2) Crl.L.J.397 (Chandra Deo Singh Case). For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran for M/s.S.Mohamed Azharudeen Sharof For Respondents : Mr.M.Loganathan for R1 and R2 Mr.K.M.Aasim Shehzad for R3 for M/s.BFS Legal Firm R4 - No Appearance 1/3

O R D E R

The criminal revision case has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 10.08.2023 in Cr.M.P.1671 of 2023 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge for SC/ST(POA) Act, Thiruppur District.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submitted that the petitioner petitioner filed the complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. since he was fighting for his promotion and the cases were pending before this Court. The learned counsel further submitted that it would suffice if this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. 3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this revision is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. 29.07.2024 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1.The Principal Sessions Judge for SC/ST(POA) Act, Thiruppur District.

2/3

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

pri 29.07.2024 3/3