Sekar v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.25203 of 2021 SEKAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARCOT TOWN POLICE STATION, RANIPET DISTRICT (CRIME NO.589 OF 2021) For Petitioner : M/S S.P.ARTHI Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody for the offences under Sections 447, 294(b), 307 and 506(ii) IPC @ 302 IPC, in Crime No.589 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the son of the deceased. The petitioner is the paramour of the deceased. The deceased had developed relationship with one Srinivasan. Aggrieved by the same, on the date of occurrence, the petitioner attacked the deceased and the said Srinivasan with blowing horn due to which, they both sustained injuries. Later, the mother of the defacto complainant died. Hence, the complaint.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he would pray for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would vehemently oppose stating that the investigation has not been completed and if the petitioner is released on bail, there is every possibility of him getting abscond and tampering the evidence.

5. On seeing the grave nature of offence and the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence and if the petitioner is released on bail, there is every possibility of him getting abscond and tampering the evidence. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 22/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARCOT TOWN POLICE STATION, RANIPET DISTRICT 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, VELLORE.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S S.P.ARTHI Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.25203/2021 Date :22/12/2021 JPA 05/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/