Appu v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.09.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Appu ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, T-2, Ambattur Estate Police Station, Tiruvallur District.

(Crime No. 502 of 2024).

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in Crime No. 502 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Samson For Respondent : M/s.G.V.Kasthuri, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.08.2024, for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(2), 311 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 1/6

in Crime No.502 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 18.08.2024, at about 9.00 p.m., when the petitioner returning from work near Kalaivanan Nagar, the petitioner along with other accused, waylaid the defacto complainant and demanded to give money to consume alcohol, when the defacto complainant refused, the petitioner threatened him by showing a knife and robbed a sum of Rs.895/- from him. Hence, the complaint.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He would further submit that the petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody for more than 25 days and is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that on the date of the alleged occurrence, the petitioner waylaid the defacto complainant and demanded to give money, 2/6

when he refused, the petitioner threatened him by showing knife and also robbed a sum of Rs.895/- from the defacto complainant. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous cases, pending against him. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, nature of offence, and the money involved in this case, and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, and the petitioners has no previous cases pending against him, and also considering all others factors, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur, and on further conditions that:- 3/6

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three months and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the Petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected;

[c] the Petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

[d] the Petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court 4/6

himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

11.09.2024 drl To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur.

2.The Inspector of Police, T-2, Ambattur Estate Police Station, Tiruvallur District.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal-II.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

P.DHANABAL, J.

drl 11.09.2024 6/6