K.Janarthanan v. State Represented By

Crl.O.P.No.25843 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.25843 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.169 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that due to wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant in a temple festival and during the quarrel, the petitioner along with other accused abused him in filthy language and attacked him with bricks. Hence the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that it is a case and case in counter. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that during the temple festival, the petitioner and the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.25843 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

vkr defacto complainant have assaulted each other. He would further submit that this is 3rd application for anticipatory bail and the earlier applications were dismissed on the ground that the petitioner was having three previous cases. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Taking into account the nature of offence and the previous antecedents of the petitioner and also of the fact that two earlier applications for anticipatory bail were dismissed and there is no change of circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 31.10.2022 vkr Crl.O.P.No.25843 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis