R.Perumal v. V.Ponnathal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 21.06.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA R.Perumal .. Appellant

Versus

1.V.Ponnathal 2.A.Rajammal 3.R.Chellathal 4.R.Sumathy @ Anbumoli [Respondent 3 and 4 are given up] .. Respondents Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2017 made in O.S.No.22 of 2010 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Erode. For Appellant : Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Jayaganeshan for R1 and R2

J U D G M E N T

This Appeal Suit has been preferred challenging the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2017 made in O.S.No.22 of 2010 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Erode.

1 / 4

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the appellant/1st defendant and the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2/plaintiffs submitted that the dispute between the parties, has been amicably settled out of Court. Both the parties are present and the terms of compromise dated 16.02.2022 along with a memo, dated 11.04.2022 filed. The compromise memo is read out to the parties and they accepted the terms of compromise. The terms of compromise recorded.

3. In view of the compromise memo filed, this Appeal Suit is allowed in terms of the compromise, as settled out of Court. The judgment and decree dated 28.06.2017 passed in O.S.No.22 of 2010 by the learned II Additional District Judge, Erode is set aside. The Memo of Compromise shall form part of the decree. Registry is directed to refund half of the Court fee to the appellant as per Rules. No costs. 21.06.2022 Index : Yes/No Speaking order/ Non-Speaking order ms 2 / 4

To

1. The II Additional District Court, Erode.

2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

3 / 4

R.N.MANJULA, J., ms 21.06.2022 4 / 4