Madras High CourtWP/23223/2004dismissed as infructuous

K.V.Subramanian v. The Secy., Regional Transport

2018-08-13Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.08.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.No.23223 of 2004 K.V.Subramanian .. Petitioner vs The Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Regional Transport Officer, Kancheepuram.

.. Respondent Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Prohibition, prohibiting the respondent from proceeding with the timing conference on 12.08.2004 as per R.No.A3/14458/2001 dated 14.07.2004.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Narasimhan For Respondent : Mrs. Ramya Revathy, G.A.

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as Infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpl https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Regional Transport Officer, Kancheepuram.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.56875 W.P.No.23223 of 2004 GSP(05/09/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/