Sathiyamoorthy v. State By

Crl.OP No.7266 of 2016 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 & A2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 448, 427 & 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.253 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused have trespassed into the property of the Nataraja Perumal Temple and criminally intimidated the defacto complainant.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that in this occurrence, no one injured.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and further considering that no one injured in this occurrence, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM , J.

sms 6.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Avinashi and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sms 04.04.2016 Crl.OP No.7266 of 2016