P.Deenadayalan v. The Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.11.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.NOS.9477 & 9478 OF 2017 P.Deenadayalan .. Petitioner in W.P.No.9477 of 2017 D.Damodaran .. Petitioner in W.P.No.9478 of 2017 -vs1.The Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk, Poonamallee, Chennai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District.

3.The Tahsildar, Avadi Taluk, Avadi, Chennai.

.. Respondents in both the cases Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation sent by the petitioner dated 03.04.2017 within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioners ::No appearance For Respondents ::Mr.V.Shanmuga Sundar, Special Government Pleader COMMON ORDER When the matters were taken up for hearing i.e. on 20.11.2019, there was no representation for the petitioners and therefore, the same was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal' so as to enable the counsel to argue the matters. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the above, the writ petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CJ Conf.) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vga To 1.

The Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk, Poonamallee, Chennai.

2.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District.

3.

The Tahsildar, Avadi Taluk, Avadi, Chennai.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.97623 W.P.Nos.9477 & 9478 of 2017 SJ(CO) CS/19/12/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/