← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/21345/2025granted

Jjj.Ananth@Jo Lurdu Jorald Ananth v. State By

2025-08-06Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.08.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR JJJ.Ananth @ Jo Lurdu Jorald Ananth ... Petitioner Vs.

The State by, The SHO, Elavanasoorkottai Police Station.

(Crime No.134 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.134 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner :

Mr.D.Ashok Kumar For Respondent :

Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.07.2025, for the offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 329(4), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 325, 109, 351(3) of BNS r/w 3 of TNPPDL Act and section 3 of Explosive substance act in Crime No.134 of 2025, on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

1/4

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to the money dispute between the first accused and the de facto complainant, A1 along with the other accused had abused and attacked the de facto complainant, hurled petrol bomb and damaged his house. Hence the case.

3. The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the petitioner/A2 is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case since he happens to be the friend of A1. He further submitted that the de facto complainant, who is the vice president of the village, had borrowed a sum of Rs.20 lakhs from the first accused and there was a dispute with regard to the repayment of the said amount and thereby, he had lodged a false complaint to evade repayment. Hence he prayed for the grant of bail.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for granting bail to the petitioner. He further submitted that there are 12 accused in this case and the petitioner is arrayed as A2.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and taking note of the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to 2/4

the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on him executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ulundurpet, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required; [d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses; [e] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [f] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the 3/4

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

ham aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

06.08.2025 ham Note :

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ulundurpet.

2. The SHO, Elavanasoorkottai Police Station.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cuddalore.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/4