S.Sathya v. Superintendent Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 01.08.2025 Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN -- T.Sathya .. Petitioner Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, SP Camp Office, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu - 631 501.
2.The Inspector of Police Law and Order, C-3, Manimangalam Police Station, Sriperumbudur Road, Kundrathur, Kanchipuram - 601 301.
3.The Tahsildar, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Tiruvalllur Road, Kanchipuram Distrit - 602 105.
4.The Firca Surveyor, Sriperumbdur Taluk, Tiruvallur Road, Kanchipuram District - 602 105.
.. Respondents Writ Petition is filed for issuance of Mandamus, directing the respondent to provide police protection for the Government Officials to survey the petitioner land situated at Serpanajeri Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Kanchipuram District, bearing S.No.236/5, on the basis of the representation given by the petitioner to the second respondent dated 25.02.2025 and also lodged a complaint via online (No.HTS25131908) to the respondent dated 11.03.2025. 1 / 5
For petitioner : Mr.A.K.L.Jeyakamal Rayudu For respondents: Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent Police to provide police protection for the survey to be conducted on the petitioner's property situated at Serpanajeri Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Kanchipuram District, bearing Survey No. 236/5.
2. It is stated that the petitioner had applied for the survey, and when the surveyor along with village officials attended the property on 25.02.2025, certain persons obstructed the survey by throwing stones and assaulting the officials. The petitioner claims to have lodged complaints with the respondent Police, including an online complaint dated 11.03.2025, but no effective action was taken, and the surveyor refused to proceed without police protection. Hence, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent Police to provide necessary police protection to enable completion of the survey.
3. When an application is made to survey a property, it is the duty of the surveyor to complete the survey in accordance with the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act. In case of any grievance or obstruction during the survey, it is for the concerned surveyor or Tahsildar to approach the police for assistance and 2 / 5
protection. There is no material on record to show that any such request for police protection was made by the Tahsildar or the surveyor to the respondent police. The petitioner, being a private individual, has no locus standi to directly file this writ petition seeking police protection. Where government officials face obstruction in performing their duties, it is the officials themselves who must seek police protection and not the petitioner. Thus, the present writ petition is not properly maintainable.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. 01.08.2025 r n s Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No 3 / 5
To 1.The Superintendent of Police, SP Camp Office, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu - 631 501.
2.The Inspector of Police Law and Order, C-3, Manimangalam Police Station, Sriperumbudur Road, Kundrathur, Kanchipuram - 601 301.
3.The Tahsildar, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Tiruvalllur Road, Kanchipuram Distrit - 602 105.
4.The Firca Surveyor, Sriperumbdur Taluk, Tiruvallur Road, Kanchipuram District - 602 105.
5. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.
4 / 5
P.VELMURUGAN, J r n s 01.08.2025 5 / 5