Praveen @ Killi Praveen v. State Rep By

Crl.OP.No.25394 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.25394 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.09.2022, for the offences punishable under Section 394 of IPC @ 395 of IPC in Crime No.633 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused have assaulted the defacto complainant, snatched the cell phone, cash of Rs.4,000/-, Aadhar card and wallet from him. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that they are innocent person and they have nothing to do with alleged offence. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate would submit that the petitioners are habitual offenders against whom there are two previous cases of similar in nature pending against them. He would further submit that the investigation is still pending and thereby, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.25394 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

vkr 5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and there are two previous cases each pending against them and that the petitioners have been arrested very recently on 19.09.2022, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed for the present.

01.11.2022 vkr Crl.O.P.No.25394 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis