Aravindan v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirteenth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.25383 of 2021 1 ARAVINDAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 SENTHIL @ JOHN SENTHIL Vs 1 STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB TEAM II, CHENNAI.

CRIME NO.122/2021 2 THE SUB REGISTRAR, PALLAVARAM.

(R-2 SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN CRL OP.640 AND 661/2022 AND CRL OP.25383/2021 DATED 20/01/2022) For Petitioner : M/S.S.N.ARUNKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH (Government Advocate Crl. Side) (R-1) For Respondent : MR.P.R.MURUGAN RAJA (Government Advocate for (R2) For Intervener : M/S.A.MANIKANDAN, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 417, 419, 465, 467, 468 & 471 read with 34 of IPC in Crime No.122 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. It is reported that in the direction of this Court to cancel the document after conducting due enquiry, the Sub Registrar, Pallavaram has filed a report.

3. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Tambaram, on condition that the petitioners shall execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (c)the petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when required for interrogation;

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 13/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, TAMBARAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB TEAM II, CHENNAI.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE SUB REGISTRAR, PALLAVARAM.

+2 CC to M/S.S.N.ARUNKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.5733 CRL OP.25383/2021 Date :13/04/2022 TA-20/04/2022