Erusappan v. The District Collector
1/6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06-08-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Erusappan Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District Collector Salem.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Mettur Taluk, Salem District.
3.The Tahsildar Omalur Tlauk, Salem District.
4.Seethalakshmi 5.Arivuselvan 6.Thangamani Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to
2/6 cancel the legal heir certificate in certificate No. TN 720231118755 dated 03.12.2023 consequently and issue fresh certificate including all legal heirs of deceased Mariayee @ Mariammal and direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take appropriate steps to penalize the respondents 4 to 6 for their illegal act of concealing one legal heir of Mariayee @ mariammal and obtaining legal heir certificate.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.T.Ganesan For Respondent(s):
Mr.R.Neelangandan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.R.Murthi Government Advocate for R1 to R3
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed for issue of writ of mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to cancel the legal heir ship certificate dated 03.12.2023 and to issue a fresh certificate by including all the legal heirs of the deceased Mariayee @ Mariammal and also direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take appropriate steps to penalize respondents 4 to 6 for concealing the name of one of the legal heir in the legal heirship certificate.
3/6 2.Heard Mr.T.Ganesan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr.E.Vijay Anand and Mr.R.Neelagandan, learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. 3.In the considered view of this Court, the petitioner is a complete stranger to the family of Mariayee @ Mariammal and he wants the legal heriship certificate to be issued by including the names of one of the left out legal heir based on some civil proceedings which is pending before the Court below. The petitioner has no locus standi to question the legal heirship certificate and whatever grounds are raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition can always be raised in the pending suit which will be dealt with by the Civil Court on its own merits and in accordance with law. Such application submitted by third parties can never be entertained by the concerned authority, since determination of relationship can be done only by acting upon the application submitted by the relative and not by a stranger.
4/6 4.This Court does not find any merits in this writ petition and accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No Costs. 06-08-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ssr
5/6 To
1. The District Collector Salem.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Mettur Taluk, Salem District.
3.The Tahsildar Omalur Tlauk, Salem District.
6/6 N.ANAND VENKATESH J.
ssr 06-08-2025