← Library
Madras High CourtWA/3934/2003disposed of

The Superintending Engineer, v. The Government Of Tamil Nadu,

2016-01-27Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.01.2016 CORAM :

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.A. No.3934 of 2003 The Superintending Engineer, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle, North, No.791, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.

.. Appellant -vs1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Labour and Employment Department, Chennai-600 009.

3.The Inspector of Labour, Thiruvallur.

4.G.Udhayan 5.A.K.Boobalan 6.D.Kothandan 7.G.Mohan 8.V.Senthil Kumar 9.M.Anandan 10.Devendran 11.S.Raji 12.M.Jeyagopi 13.M.Jestin 14.M.Arumugam 15.R.Ravichandran .. Respondents Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 28.08.2003 made in W.P.No.11233 of 2002 on the file of this Court.

W.P.No.11233 of 2002 dated 28/8/2003:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, Calling for the records of the 3rd respondent/Inspector of Labour, Tiruvallur relating to the proceedings in the Na.Ka.No.3111/1999 dated 30/6/2001 directing the petitioner to confer permanent status to the respondents 4 to 15 as worker in TamilNadu Electricity Board, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle/North, Chennai and quash the same as illegal and without Jurisdiction.

For Appellant :

Mr.R.Varalakshmi For Respondents :

Mr.V.R.Kamalanathan Addl.G.P. for R1 to R3 Mr.P.Magesh for R9 No Appearance - R7,10,11

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) It appears that because of the lapse of time, the persons who are beneficiaries of the impugned order have lost their interest in the matter other than those who already stand permanently absorbed, being respondent Nos.4, 11, 13 and 14, qua whom the appeal has become infructuous. The learned counsel for the appellant states that despite their endeavour to locate the addresses from the Union and serve the remaining respondents at the given addresses, they appear to have shifted or are not available at the given addresses.

2. We feel keeping this appeal pending would be a futile exercise and thus dispose of the appeal with a direction that if any other respondents come forthwith to claim their rights, the matter can be revived. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

To 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Energy Department, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Secretary to Labour and Employment Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-600 009.

3.The Inspector of Labour, Thiruvallur.

+1cc to The Government Pleader, Sr.5128 W.A.No.3934 of 2003 ad(CO) srg(11/02/2016)