← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/26763/2023ordered

E. Anandakumar v. R. Madhan Kumar

2024-06-19Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh1 pages

C.M.P.No.26763 of 2023 in C.M.A.Sr.No.117624 of 2023 N.ANAND VENKATESH , J The 1st respondent remained ex-parte even before the Tribunal and hence, notice is dispensed with. Mrs.R.Sreevidhya, learned counsel, takes notice on behalf of second respondent.

2. This Civil Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 155 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the records.

4. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 155 days in filing the above appeal is condoned.

5. Registry is directed to number the main Civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. Registry is directed to print the name of Mrs.R.Sreevidhya, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, at the time of admission.

It is made clear that for the period of delay of 155 days, the appellant will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. 19.06.2024 ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis