J.Mohammed Ashiq v. The State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifth day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.25992 of 2021 J.MOHAMMED ASHIQ [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, FLOWER BAZAAR, CHENNAI -1.

CRIME NO.5 OF 2021.

For Petitioner : M/S.K.MADHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. S.BALAJI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for an offence under Section 4 of the Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 and Section 506(1) of I.P.C in Crime No.5 of 2021, seeks Anticipatory Bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had one side love with the de-facto complainant. Further, when the parents of the de-facto complainant arranged her marriage with another person, the petitioner contacted the bridegroom and spoken ill of her character and sent the photos which he had taken with the de-facto complainant during his stay in her house, due to which, the marriage was cancelled. Thereafter, the petitioner also threatened the defacto complainant and her family members with dire consequences. Hence, the law enforcing agency registered a case against the petitioner, base on the complaint lodged by the de-facto complainant. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. It is seen from records that this is the third Anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner. The previous orders, dismissing the Criminal Original petitions were passed by this Court.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submitted that there is no change in circumstances after the previous orders were passed on merits. Hence, the learned Government Advocate vehemently opposed to grant Anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.

In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, no change of circumstances arises for considering the third Anticipatory bail petition. Hence, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 05/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, FLOWER BAZAAR, CHENNAI -1 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.K.MADHAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.25992/2021 Date :05/01/2022 RW 10/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/