Thrisanku v. The Superintending

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 11.11.2022 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Thrisanku ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2. The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Rayakottai Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Asst. Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, TANGEDCO, SIDCO, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

4. Venkatesh

5. Mogun

6. Rama

7. Raja

8. Halumalli

9. Devendran

10. Karpagam .. Respondents 1/4

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings dated 02.03.2017 passed inLr.No.U.Po/E&Para/Hosur/Ko.Pugar manu/A.No.101/17 on the file of the third respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to disconnect the Electricity service connection granted to the respondents 4 to 10 herein, within a stipulated period. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh, Standing Counsel for R1 to R3 No appearance for R4 to R10

ORDER

Today, when the matter is take up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Though the writ petition is of the year 2017, there is no representation for the petitioner, which would go to show that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.

2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

11.11.2022 Index: Yes/No mst 2/4

To

1. The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2. The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Rayakottai Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Asst. Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, TANGEDCO, SIDCO, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

3/4

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J., mst 11.11.2022 4/4