M. Chitra v. M. Arunachalam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Date: 19.09.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP M.Chitra ...Appellant Vs.

1. M.Arunachalam (Died)

2. Rajeswari

3. Sasirekha

4. Indhumathi

5. Janani

...Respondents

PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2017 made in O.S.No.546 of 2013 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore. For Appellant :

M/s.V.S.Usha Rani

JUDGMENT

Learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that she had entered appearance by filing Vakalat on 11.09.2024. Also the learned Counsel who entered appearance claims that the Appellant and the legal heirs of the Sole

Respondent had entered into amicable settlement. Therefore the Appellant is not intended to proceed with the Appeal.

2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent appeared through virtual mode and submits that they have returned the case records to the Respondents. Therefore, the name of the learned Counsel for the Respondent shall be deleted.

3. Registry is directed to remove the name of the learned Counsel for the Respondent and print the name of the Respondent in the cause list.

4. Memo filed by the learned Counsel for the Appellant dated 11.07.2024 is recorded.

5. The Appeal is dismissed as settled between the parties. The Appellant is entitled to refund of Court fee. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

19.09.2024 shl Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

To:

1. The IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.

2. The Section Officer V.R.Records High Court of Madras.

19.09.2024