M.A.Moorthy v. The Commissioner

in W.P.No.33445 of 2024 M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity].

2. Captioned WMP has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of 'two notices, one dated 15.03.2024 bearing reference k/m/13/e/f/vz;-rpwg;g[-2024 issued by R3 [Assistant Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai] and another dated 28.05.2024 issued by R2 [The Zonal Officer, Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai]' [hereinafter 'impugned notices' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

Page Nos.1/3

3. Mr.S.Anil Sandeep, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioner adverting to support affidavit submitted that the writ petitioner was served with only copy of impugned notices and therefore, writ petitioner is not able to file the original impugned notices. Learned counsel drew the attention of this Court to paragraph No.11 of the support affidavit, which reads as follows: '11. I state that I had not been served with the original impugned notices and had been provided only with the copy of the impugned notices by the respondents. Hence this writ petition is being filed with the copy of the impugned notices and hence, filing of the original impugned notices may be dispensed with in the interests of justice.'

5. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for. [M.S., J] [K.R.S., J] 15.11.2024 mk Page Nos.2/3

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., mk in W.P.No.33445 of 2024 15.11.2024 (2/2) Page Nos.3/3