Rajathi v. Ananthayee

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 11.03.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM and CMP.No.18044 of 2017 1.Rajathi 2.Revathi ...

Appellants Vs.

1.Ananthayee 2.R.Suresh 3.R.Jayalakshmi 4.A.Duraisamy 5.A.Saroja 6.A.Kamala ...

Respondents Prayer :- The Appeal suit is filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 06.03.2017 made in O.S.No.279 of 2013 on the file of the First Additional District Judge, Salem.

For Petitioner ...

No appearance For Respondent ...

Ms.Zeenath Begum Nos.1,3,5 & 6 For Respondent ...

Mr.T.Saikrishnan Nos.2 & 4 1/3

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 03.07.2024, there was no representation on the side of the appellant and hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on 10.07.2024. Further, it was taken up for hearing on 06.02.2025, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. Therefore, the matter is directed to be listed on 28.02.2025. 2.Today i.e. on 11.03.2025, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, the appeal suit is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No 11.03.2025 sms To The First Additional District Judge, Salem.

V.SIVAGNANAM,J., 2/3

sms and CMP.No.18044 of 2017 11.03.2025 3/3