A.Lakshmanan v. Neyveli Lignit Corporation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.12.2015 CORAM :

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.A. No.3965 of 2003 and W.A.M.P.No.6508 of 2003 1.A.Lakshmanan 2.N.Chitrarasu 3.K.Chinnappa 4.A.Gunasekaran 5.N.Muthukumarasamy 6.V.Ravi 7.K.Shanmugam 8.R.Raja 9.K.Paramasivam 10.C.Venkatesan 11.G.Tamilarasan 12.C.Arumugam 13.N.Ranganathan 14.K.Selvakumar 15.S.Elangovan 16.G.Palanisamy 17.D.Sivan 18.V.Padmanabhan 19.V.Sundaram 20.M.Chandramoorthy 21.K.Govindaraj 22.G.Mayakrishnan 23.R.Kamaraj 24.S.Ramalingam 25.R.Devaraj 26.K.Vedhamani 27.T.Duraiarasan 28.G.Selladurai 29.S.Thangamani 30.P.Jayapal 31.C.Samidurai 32.R.Mathiyazhagan 33.T.Kaliyaperumal 34.A.Panneer Selvam 35.V.Kathirvel

36.S.Kasilingam 37.T.Soundra Rajan 38.R.Murugan .. Appellants/Petitioners -vs1.Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Rep. by the Chairman, Neyveli, South Arcot District.

2.N.L.C. INDCOSERVE, IND No.1812, Opp. to Thermal Power Station, Neyveli, S.A. District, Rep. by the Managing Director.

.. Respondents/Respondents Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 14.10.2003 in W.P.No.20690 of 1999 on the file of this Court.

WP.No.20690 of 1999:Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the first respondent Corporation to appoint the Contractuals in the regular posts in the first respondent Corporation on the basis of their date of entry into service in the first respondent Corporation either through the private Contractors or the second respondent Society after preparing the seniority list and putting the same in the Corporation place or any other appropriate Writ or direction. For Appellants :

Mr.R.Singaravelan For Respondents :

Mr.N.A.K.Sarma * * * * *

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) On hearing the learned counsel for parties and on being pointed out the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation INDCOSERVE Thozhilalar Uzhiyar Sangam, 2014 (1) SCC 704, it is quite apparent that the seniority list has been drawn for absorption and it has been observed that in case there is any grievance / objection to the management of the Corporation, the same may be examined by the Corporation.

2.In view of the aforesaid context, learned counsel for the appellant states that out of 38 appellants before the Court, 21 are already included in the seniority list and four have been made permanent. Appellants 14, 24, 25 and 31 have passed away and the lis does not survive and the remaining appellants are seeking their inclusion in the list by approaching the Corporation.

3.He, thus, submits that the appeal may be disposed of in terms aforesaid.

4.Writ Appeal, thus, stands disposed of in terms aforesaid. No costs. Consequently, W.A.M.P.No.6508 of 2003 stands closed. -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar sra To The Chairman, Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Neyveli, South Arcot District.

+1 cc to M/S.N.A.K.Sarma, Advocate sr.67913 W.A.No.3965 of 2003 ug(co) aa05/01/2016