← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/25372/2021granted

D.Ganesan v. State Rep.By

2022-01-06Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.01.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.25372 of 2021 Ganesan

...Petitioner

Versus

State By, The Inspector of Police Velipalayam Police Station Nagapattinam District.

(Crime No.310 of 2021)

...Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.310 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police station.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Duraisamy for Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 174(3) Cr.P.C altered into Section 304(b) IPC in Crime No.310 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had married the daughter of the defacto complainant. Further, the petitioner and his family members had harassed the daughter of the defacto complainant for demanded additional dowry, due to which, the deceased Shad committed suicide by hanging. Hence, the complainant was registered.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner and his family demanded additional dowry, due to which the deceased had committed suicide and the investigation is almost completed. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner is working as IT and having two children aged about 3 and 1 1⁄2 years and the childrens are under custody of this petitioner and the investigation is almost completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the Judicial Magistrate-II, Nagapattinam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 06/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE- II, NAGAPATTINAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT (FOR INFORMATION).

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S. S.DORAISAMY Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.298 CRL OP.25372/2021 Date :06/01/2022 INBA▬12/01/2022